Archive Liste Typographie
Message : RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions" (Robert Keeble) - Mercredi 29 Septembre 1999 |
Navigation par date [ Précédent Index Suivant ] Navigation par sujet [ Précédent Index Suivant ] |
Subject: | RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions" |
Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:37:39 -0600 |
From: | Robert Keeble <RKeeble@xxxxxxxxx> |
O. Randier disait: > In XPress, I usually set variable space to 25% in typographic > preferences > to get correct thin space (I use to type variable space instead of > non-breaking thin space as suggested in the handbook, because > the last one > seems to be bugged). But I don't know what that 25% refers to > : em-space, > en-space, figure space? That's not clear (should be). I would be very > interested to know exactly how XPress does its calculation about that, > because it seems there are issues between electronic and lead > type as to > what really means an em-space. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You mean, is it measured off the actual 'm' character, or equal to the point size? Here's the rundown on all the QXP spaces: standard space (word space) = the width of the space character in the font, but is scaled by the 'optimum' setting in the H&Js diaog. en-space = if standard em space is checked in preferences/character, it is 1/2 the point size, otherwise it is the width of the zero character. flex space = scaled by user from the en-space character. punct space = the width of the point ('.') character. Rob Keeble Quark, Inc.
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", (continued)
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Alain Hurtig (08/10/1999)
- RE: [XP] Italisation Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Olivier RANDIER (08/10/1999)
- RE: [XP] Italisation Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Jean-Denis Rondinet (08/10/1999)
RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Robert Keeble <=
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Olivier RANDIER (29/09/1999)
RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Robert Keeble (30/09/1999) RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Robert Keeble (30/09/1999)